The Harms Are Specific, the Gains Are Vague
I was half-listening to an AI regulation podcast when the pattern landed. Not a new podcast — there are a thousand of them now, all saying roughly the same things with different levels of alarm. This one had someone who had actually read the filings, the testimony, the CEO letters to Congress. I was not taking notes. I was making lunch. That is where I heard it: the AI company leaders are very specific about harms. They can name the displaced workers — coders, first, but then radiologists, paralegals, customer service reps. They cite the studies on teenage mental health and algorithmic exposure. They talk about AI-generated pornography with enough specificity to suggest they have thought hard about it internally. The precision is striking when…
